Global: The World's Only Growth Story
Stephen Roach (New York) - Nov 11, 2002
China is continuing to have extraordinary success in separating
itself from the rest of the pack. That's true of its economic performance
when compared with the rest of Asia. It's also true when compared
with the rest of the world. Ironically, the Chinese, themselves,
don't see it that way. To them, China is still a poor country in
the midst of a most daunting transformation.
This contrast between how China sees itself and how the world perceives
China was the overriding theme of a one-week tour I have just completed
of Beijing, Shanghai, Suzhou, and Shenzhen. Accompanying me were
a diverse group of senior investors and industrial leaders from
Europe, Russia, South Africa, and the United States. Some were seasoned
China hands. Others were not. But all of them walked away truly
staggered at what they saw. In the macro business, it's easy to
get caught up in your own point of view. Since I go to China so
often, I welcomed a fresh perspective. I last led a similar mission
some 18 months ago. The contrast between these two trips is a great
way to benchmark shifting perceptions about China's journey. A lot
has changed in the world since the spring of 2001, especially the
context of a much weaker global economy. But as I look back at my
notes from both of these trips, it's the transformation of China
that jumps off the page. What seemed so tentative to many a year
and a half ago, no longer does. China has come of age in shaping
its own destiny and in impacting the broader global arena. One the
of the savviest and most seasoned investors on the trip, summed
it up succinctly, "China is simply mind blowing."
China's economic progress is evident on three fronts -- breadth,
depth, and scale. In terms of breadth, it's all about China's gathering
success in moving up the value chain. That's true of the shifting
composition of its exports -- away from consumer softgoods and into
increasingly sophisticated electronics and other forms of information
technology. Andy Xie has calculated that high technology goods have
accounted for 42% of China's export growth in the year ending August
2002. But it's also true in the shifting mix of its aggregate demand
-- especially the emphasis on domestic demand. China's growth dynamic
is still heavily dependent on exports -- this segment of the economy
accounted for 54% of total GDP growth in the first half of 2002.
There is growing recognition in the Chinese leadership that such
external reliance is excessive and must now change.
As such, support to domestic demand is now very much the focus
of Chinese macro policy. The trick, of course, is to pull it off.
Infrastructure spending continues to play an important role in this
regard, but there are also budding signs of an emerging consumer
culture in China, as well. That stands in sharp contrast to what
was evident 18 months ago. Nowhere was that more obvious than in
Shenzhen -- Hong Kong's twin city near the mouth of the Pearl River.
We had a fascinating meeting with Shenzhen's dynamic and relatively
youthful mayor, Yu Youjin. He was as impressive as any politician
in the West, and was filled with energy in describing the explosive
growth of this 22-year old city that now has a population in excess
of 7 million. Shenzhen is loaded with some of China's most dynamic
and exciting companies; we met with two of the most impressive ones
-- Huawei Technologies and Ping An Insurance. But the statistic
that stuck most in my mind was Shenzhen's youth -- a population
with an average age of 29, making it perhaps the youngest major
city on the world today. The streets are alive with shops, movie
theaters, and car dealerships; there is even a Sam's Club. You get
a real sense that the birth of the Chinese consumer is now taking
place in Shenzhen.
In terms of depth, China's progress is also unmistakable. Infrastructure
lays the groundwork. It's not just roads -- now some of the best
in the world. It's also the wiring of the Information Age. We visited
the Suzhou New District (SND), an industrial development zone about
two hours west of Shanghai by car that has only been in existence
since 1990. The 52-square-kilometer area comes complete with its
own fiber optic telecom grid. From Motorola and Dupont to Sony and
Canon, some 614 foreign multinationals have set up business in the
SND. We spent some time with Solectron, a leading electronics outsourcer,
and learned first hand of the appeal of China. Due to the global
IT slump, Solectron has pared its worldwide headcount by 30,000
over the past couple of years; however, its staffing in China is
going the other way, led by a doubling of its current facilities
in Suzhou.
Yet there's more to infrastructure than just highways and telecom
cables. It's also about human capital -- scientists, engineers,
and the development of a new managerial class. The Chinese are the
first to concede they have a real problem on the management front:
The legacy effects of a planned economy left a glaring hole in this
key segment of the labor force. To get a better understanding of
how China is attempting to overcome this problem, we spent part
of the afternoon at one of China's leading new business schools
-- China Europe International Business School in the Pudong area
of Shanghai. The briefing from the CEIBS administration was impressive,
but the students said it all. Bright, inquisitive, well-informed,
articulate, and energetic, they compared favorably with any we had
run across in the West. China has been lagging in its investment
in human capital. A recent paper by Nobel laureate James Heckman
found that China's public expenditures on education stood at just
2.5% of its GDP in 1995, less than half the 5.4% ratio in the US
but not all that far from Japan's 3.6% share. As efforts such as
those at CEIBS expand, I believe there is nothing but upside to
China's potential on the human capital front.
The combination of physical infrastructure, human capital, and
new technologies speaks volumes to the ultimate arbiter of China's
depth -- productivity enhancement. It's an increasingly challenging
combination for the rest of the world to face. As one of more seasoned
industrial leaders on our trip said, "I don't know of anyone in
the electronics business that isn't contemplating a major investment
in China to the tune of $1-2 billion per plant. Any company that
doesn't," he concluded, "will find its performance punished." Nor
is there a problem with product quality. I heard this earlier on
my Asian tour from the senior management of Sony in Japan. They
stressed that there was absolutely no difference whatsoever in the
product quality coming from Japan or from their five manufacturing
plants in China.
We also saw the quality story first hand at Huawei, the giant Chinese
counterpart of Cisco. With its vast array of telecom network solutions
conforming to the international quality standards and protocols,
Huawei's cost efficiency loomed all the more formidable. As one
of the investors said, "It's easy to lose money in technology these
days, but Huawei may have the best cost structure in the world to
produce increasingly commoditized technology products. The high-cost
industrial world isn't even close." Nor is Huawei just about cheap,
high-quality production. It is nearing completion on a new R&D complex
in its Shezhen campus, a high-rise facility that can house up to
10,000 of Huawei's engineers and scientists. China has long been
criticized for its lack of IT innovation. Huawei's massive R&D efforts
promise to challenge that perception.
Which brings me to scale -- the third dimension of the Chinese
economic miracle. China has never been small. However, while it
contains fully one-fourth of the world's population, it currently
accounts for only about 4% of world GDP. China's leaders continue
to stress this latter statistic in minimizing China's impact on
the world at large. But it's change at the margin that matters most
in shaping global trends. On that count, there can be no mistaking
the impact of China's rapidly increasing scale. While China now
makes up about 4.5% of global trade, Andy Xie estimates that the
nation currently accounts for approximately one fifth of the growth
in global trade.
Scale has always been China's siren call. The generic refrain we
have all heard for years, goes something like this: "If each of
China's 1.3 billion citizens were to buy only one paper clip a year..."
That really misses the point. The past 20 years of economic development
have raised the base for industrial output, exports, and even domestic
demand. Huawei, itself, speaks volumes about the scale of China's
growing industrial clout. And it is only just the beginning. In
Japan, I also met with Nissan's management. They were astonished
that their vehicle sales in domestic Chinese markets were surging
by 80% from year-earlier levels; moreover, they stressed that the
comparisons were not off a small base. Say what you want about the
stereotypical Chinese worker making a dollar a day. There's a critical
mass forming in China that now puts the scale of its accomplishments
in a very different light.
Which brings me to the bottom line of my latest sojourn to China:
China is now beginning to come to grips with the global context
of many of its macro problems. The senior officials we met with
in Beijing were quite frank in expressing their concerns about global
deflation. They were also convinced that an overvalued US dollar
was ripe for a fall. Moreover, official Beijing now concedes that
both of these developments have important consequences for China.
This is a subtle but important shift. I detected greater concern
on both counts than I did in several visits earlier this year. To
me, that's real progress. The difference comes in the sticky area
of blame. China argues that it is an innocent bystander -- and a
source of resilience -- in an otherwise shaky global economy. The
rest of the world sees it differently -- that China's emerging economic
prowess is now part of the problem. It's tempting to find a scapegoat
in tough economic times.
It would be one thing if the world were booming -- there would
be plenty of prosperity to share. But with today's global economy
in lousy shape, it's more of a zero-sum game -- one country's gains
can often come at the expense of another's. Such are the pressures
and finger-pointing that China must now face. One of the investors
on the trip summed it up best, "Just as the world must now cope
with China, China must also cope with the world." The global response
to China looms as one of the biggest unknowns in the macro equation.
It could well be the most important test of all for the world's
greatest growth story.
|